What kind of approach is associated with a sense of duty and broad absolutes?

The choice of a non-consequentialist approach is associated with a sense of duty and broad absolutes because it emphasizes the importance of moral rules and principles rather than the outcomes of actions. Non-consequentialism posits that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of the consequences they produce. This perspective aligns with deontological ethics, where actions must adhere to established duties and rights.

For instance, under a non-consequentialist framework, one might hold that telling the truth is a moral obligation, even if it could lead to a negative outcome. This creates a strong sense of duty, as individuals are expected to follow moral laws, creating a definitive framework for ethical decision-making that is consistent and universally applicable. This contrasts with other ethical theories that may prioritize the consequences of actions over moral duties or rules.